Contents

28 / 153

Image Models, by Company

Stability AI (Stable Diffusion family)

Chapter 27

7 min read

Reviewed v78 · August 2026

01

The original revolution and the subsequent collapse

We have already covered Stability AI extensively in the foundations, they were the company that funded and released the original Stable Diffusion in August 2022, and they employed the Munich researchers who built it. The historical importance of Stability AI is enormous. Without their willingness to release the model weights publicly, the entire open-source AI image ecosystem might not exist.

But Stability AI as a company has had a turbulent recent history that is worth understanding because it explains the current state of the Stable Diffusion product line. Founder Emad Mostaque was a controversial figure, charismatic, ambitious, prone to making large public claims that were difficult to back up. The company raised over $100 million and grew to nearly 200 employees. But by early 2024, internal issues were mounting: the company's commercial revenue was much smaller than the funding implied, several key research staff had left or were considering leaving, and there were disputes over who owned the Intellectual Property (IP) for Stable Diffusion (the original Munich researchers had reasonable claims to credit and ownership). In March 2024, Mostaque resigned as CEO. Shortly after, Robin Rombach and his colleagues left to found Black Forest Labs.

The company nearly collapsed in mid-2024 but was rescued by new investors and a leadership reshuffle. Stability AI today is a smaller, more focused organization that continues to release Stable Diffusion models, but it is no longer the dominant force it was in 2022 and 2023. The creative center of the open-source image generation world has moved to Black Forest Labs.

02

Stable Diffusion versions

Stable Diffusion 1.4 and 1.5 (2022)

The original public releases. 860 million parameters, U-Net architecture, CLIP text encoding, trained on a subset of LAION-5B. SD 1.5 became the dominant base model for the open-source community for nearly a year and a half. An enormous fraction of the LoRAs, fine-tunes, and custom checkpoints from 2022 to 2023 are based on SD 1.5. Even today, in 2026, there are still significant communities running SD 1.5 derivatives because the model is fast, runs on modest hardware, and has well-understood characteristics.

Stable Diffusion 2.0 and 2.1 (late 2022)

Stability's attempt to upgrade the original. Used a different text encoder (a CLIP variant called OpenCLIP rather than the original CLIP) and made some architectural changes. The result was a model that scored similar quality on benchmarks but felt different to use, and the community largely rejected it, most people stayed with SD 1.5 or moved to SDXL when it came out. SD 2.x is the only Stable Diffusion release that could fairly be called a misstep.

Stable Diffusion XL (SDXL, July 2023)

A major upgrade. 3.5 billion parameters, two text encoders (regular CLIP plus a larger CLIP variant), native 1024x1024 generation, much better quality across the board. SDXL became the new standard base model for the open-source community and held that position for over a year. The vast majority of fine-tunes and LoRAs released between mid-2023 and mid-2024 are SDXL based.

Stable Diffusion 3 (SD3, June 2024)

This was the architectural breakthrough, the first Stable Diffusion to use the MM-DiT architecture and the rectified flow training objective. 8 billion parameters in the largest variant. It introduced the dual-stream transformer with separate parallel paths for text and image tokens that we discussed in the foundations. The release was somewhat controversial, the initial 'Medium' version shipped with quality issues that the community criticized loudly, but the architectural innovations were sound, and SD3 served as the template for FLUX (which was developed by the same people who designed SD3 before they left to start Black Forest Labs).

Stable Diffusion 3.5 (October 2024)

The current Stable Diffusion flagship. Comes in three variants: 3.5 Large (8 billion parameters, highest quality), 3.5 Large Turbo (a 4-step distilled version of Large), and 3.5 Medium (2.5 billion parameters, designed to run on consumer hardware). Architecturally similar to SD3 but with significant training improvements. The Medium variant introduces an enhanced architecture called MMDiT-X with multi-resolution training, allowing the model to generate at variable resolutions more reliably. The community license allows free commercial use up to $1 million in annual revenue, with paid licenses for larger organizations.

Stable Diffusion's current strategic position is interesting. The models are still good, competitive with FLUX and the closed alternatives, but the open-source community has largely moved its center of gravity to FLUX-based workflows. SD 3.5 is used by people who want a permissively licensed open-weights model or who have existing pipelines built on Stable Diffusion infrastructure. For new projects, FLUX is more often the default choice.

03

The SD3 license backlash

The single event that best explains how Stability lost its lead is the Stable Diffusion 3 Medium release on June 12, 2024. The model was fine, but it shipped with a restrictive community license that alienated the exact open-source community that had built the brand. Free commercial use was gated behind revenue, funding, and monthly-active-user thresholds and a monthly image cap, and the terms were read as claiming ongoing control over anything fine-tuned on SD3, even models trained on SD3-generated images, with a clause implying you had to delete your models if the agreement ended. CivitAI, the community's largest resource hub, temporarily banned all SD3 content to avoid the legal exposure. A company's own core fanbase rejecting its flagship release is a rare and damning signal.

04

Two architectural eras

Stable Diffusion spans two clear architectures. Era one, from SD 1.5 through SDXL, is classic latent diffusion: a VAE compresses an image into a latent space, a U-Net denoises it there, and CLIP-style text encoders condition the result. This is the design in the original latent-diffusion paper, and SDXL, at roughly 3.5 billion parameters with two text encoders and a base-plus-refiner pipeline, was the last widely beloved fully-open Stability image base, still heavily fine-tuned today. Era two, from SD3 onward, replaced the U-Net with the Multimodal Diffusion Transformer and swapped standard diffusion training for rectified flow, described in the arXiv paper on scaling rectified flow transformers.

The MMDiT idea is genuinely important: it keeps separate weight streams for text and image tokens but joins them in the attention operation, which measurably improved typography and prompt adherence, and it influenced the whole field, including FLUX, whose founders co-authored that SD3 research. The honest caveat is that the shipped SD3 Medium weights did not fully live up to their launch-day benchmark claims, most visibly mangling human anatomy on some prompts, a reminder that a strong architecture and a strong release are not the same thing.

05

Strengths and weaknesses

Stability's strengths are its legacy and its breadth. It created the entire open image-generation ecosystem, and that installed base still runs largely on SDXL and SD 1.5, with their deep libraries of fine-tunes, LoRAs, and ControlNets; its models are efficient enough to run on consumer GPUs; the MMDiT and rectified-flow research it published is real and field-shaping; and it spans more modalities than most, across image, video, audio, and 3D experiments. The 2024 reset also brought serious industry backing and distribution through WPP, Amazon Bedrock, and Nvidia.

The weaknesses are the reasons it is now a survivor rather than the leader. FLUX and other newer models overtook it on open-weight image quality and took the community with them, the SD3 launch and its license were a self-inflicted wound, the core researchers and much senior leadership left in 2023 and 2024, and the company went through a documented near-bankruptcy before its rescue. It also carries ongoing copyright exposure, including the Getty Images litigation over training data, and a strategic ambiguity as it spreads across many modalities and shifts toward enterprise licensing that can read as retreating from the open community that made it.

06

Getting the best, and where it is headed

For practical use, the open weights for SDXL, SD 1.5, and the SD3.5 family (Large, Large Turbo, Medium) live on Hugging Face under Stability's community license, and the honest advice is that SDXL and SD 1.5 remain the most practical fully-open bases for heavy local fine-tuning because the tooling and checkpoint libraries are deepest there. For hosted access there is the Stability Developer Platform, plus Amazon Bedrock and Nvidia NIM. Read the license per model, because the thresholds on revenue, monthly active users, and volume decide whether you need a paid enterprise license, and budget for that early if your usage is commercial and large.

Check your understanding

pass: 5 of 7

Answer at least 5 of 7 correctly to unlock the next chapter.

  1. 1. What are the parameter count and core architecture of Stable Diffusion 1.5?

  2. 2. Which Stable Diffusion release is described as the only one that could fairly be called a misstep?

  3. 3. What made Stable Diffusion XL (SDXL) a major upgrade?

  4. 4. What was the architectural breakthrough in Stable Diffusion 3?

  5. 5. How many parameters does the consumer-oriented SD 3.5 Medium variant have?

  6. 6. Under the SD 3.5 community license, up to what annual revenue is free commercial use allowed?

  7. 7. What happened to Stability AI's leadership in March 2024?

The weekly briefing

Get the week's moves in your inbox.

A short, sourced digest of what actually moved across generative AI, every week. Free.

Free. One email a week, no spam, unsubscribe anytime. Prefer a reader? RSS.